Pawan Kumar Garg v. Income Tax Officer & ANR.

$~36.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2498/2020 and C.M. No. 8723/2020 PAWAN KUMAR GARG ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Sumit Kumar, Mr. Sudhir Chand Srivastava and Mr. Hemant Kumar, Advocates.

versus INCOME TAX OFFICER & ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Raghvendra Singh and Ms. Easha Kadian, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

O R D E R

% 05.03.2020 The Assessing Officer has not yet passed order in the petitioner's application under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be satisfied, in case, the said application is disposed of by the Assessing Officer expeditiously. Accordingly, we direct the Assessing Officer to pass order in the petitioner's application u/s 220(6) of the Act within the next two weeks. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. We make it clear that we have not made any observations on the merits of the petitioner's claim.

VIPIN SANGHI, J SANJEEV NARULA, J MARCH 05, 2020 B.S. Rohella