Philip Morris Brands S.A.R.L. v. Kamal Kishor Agarwal & ORS.

$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 150/2019 PHILIP MORRIS BRANDS S.A.R.L.

..... Plaintiff Represented by:

Mr.Abhishek Kotnala, Adv.

versus KAMAL KISHOR AGARWAL & ORS.

..... Defendant Represented by:

Mr.Dushyant K.Mahant, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 04.02.2020 I.A. 755/2020 (under Section 151 CPC filed by the plaintiff) 1.

The suit has already been decreed in terms of the application under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

2.

This Court vide order dated 21st October, 2019 had directed the refund of the Court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act to the plaintiff. 3.

By this application, the plaintiff prays that the Court fees be refunded in favour of its counsel 'Lall & Sethi' instead of issuing the same in the name of the plaintiff. The application is duly supported by the affidavit of the constituted attorney of the plaintiff.

4.

Consequently, the Court fee is directed to be refunded to the counsel for the plaintiff i.e. 'Lall & Sethi' under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act. 5.

Application is disposed of.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

FEBRUARY 04, 2020/akb