Surve Sachin Krishnaji v. Union Of India And ORS

$~75 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4846/2026 SURVE SACHIN KRISHNAJI .....Petitioner Through:

Ms. Ankita Patnaik. Adv.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Parth Chadha, SPC - Union of India assisted by Ms. Jyoti Pandey, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

O R D E R

% 13.04.2026 CM APPL. 23724/2026 (for exemption) 1.

Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2.

The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 4846/2026 & CM APPL. 23723/2026 3.

By way of the present petition, the Petitioner essentially prays for quashing his transfer from one place to another. 4.

The Petitioner has remained posted in the State of Maharashtra for the last 13 years. Now, he has been transferred to Sukma, Chhattisgarh.

5.

Learned counsel representing the Petitioner submits that such transfer is against certain policy instructions. 6.

It is well settled that such executive transfer policy instructions are only guiding principles and they are not judicially enforceable as The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/04/2026 at 13:22:39

they do not confer any legally enforceable right on the employees [Ref. Union of India and others v. S.L. Abbas : (1993) 4 SCC 357 and Shilpi Bose (Mrs) v. State of Bihar : 1991 Supp (2) SCC 659] 7.

Hence, the present petition is dismissed.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J AMIT MAHAJAN, J APRIL 13, 2026 "SS"

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/04/2026 at 13:22:39