Ramesh Chandra Gurjar v. The Union Of India And ORS

$~87 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 4900/2026 RAMESH CHANDRA GURJAR .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Binay Kumar Jha and Mr.

K.N. Jha, Advs.

versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Akhil Mittal, SPC with Mr.

Harshit Joshi, GP and Ms.

Shayna Das Pattanayak, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

O R D E R

% 13.04.2026 1.

The present Petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, assailing the Rejection Order dated 29.01.2026, whereby the request of the Petitioner seeking reinstatement of his service in CRPF, came to be rejected.

2.

The Petitioner herein had joined CRPF at Ajmer in the year 2011. After a passage of more than an decade, in the year 2025, he submitted an application dated 28.05.2025 before the Competent Authority seeking discharge from service on account of domestic issues.

3.

The said request of the Petitioner was accepted by the Competent Authority, and by way of an Office Order dated 11.10.2025, the Petitioner was relieved from his service w.e.f. 31.10.2025. A perusal of the said Order makes it evident that prior to the acceptance of the application preferred by the Petitioner, he was The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/04/2026 at 12:09:59

counseled against seeking discharge, however, the Petitioner did not relent and insisted on proceeding with the discharge. 4.

After a period of nearly two and a half months of his discharge, the Petitioner filed another application dated 21.01.2026 seeking reinstatement, which came to be rejected by the competent authority vide Impugned Order.

5.

Upon a query posed by the Court, with respect to the relevant rules or instructions enabling a discharged employee to seek reinstatement after he has already been discharged, learned counsel representing the Petitioner failed to draw the attention of the Court to any such rules or instructions.

6.

Hence, there is no ground to interfere, the present Writ Petition is dismissed.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

AMIT MAHAJAN, J.

APRIL 13, 2026/sp/hr The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/04/2026 at 12:09:59