← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/4473/2021

K S Dhingra v. Union Of India And ORS.

2024-05-31Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Shakdher,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Amit Bansal2 pages

$~2 (Spl.Bench) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4473/2021 K S DHINGRA .....Petitioner Through:

Mr.Shikhar Srivastava and Ms.Prerna Singh, Advs.

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Ms.Nidhi Banga, SPC with Mr.Sandeep Choudhary, Adv.

and Ms.Nasreen Khatoon, GP for R-1 to R-4 and R-6.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

O R D E R

% 21.11.2025 CM APPL. 73379/2025 (Exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

CM APPL. 73377/2025 2.

This application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 511 days in filing the present review petition. 3.

The ground urged in the application for seeking such condonation is that the petitioner had filed a Special Leave to Appeal challenging the Judgment dated 31.05.2024 within time before the Supreme Court. The same, however, came to be dismissed by an Order dated 25.09.2025, whereafter the petitioner was deciding whether to move an application seeking review of the Order of the Supreme Court or of this Court. Later, the petitioner realised that it would be more advisable to move this review petition, and in this entire process, there has been the above delay. 4.

For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/11/2025 at 11:58:56

and the application is allowed.

CM APPL. 73378/2025 5.

This application is only to place on record the Order dated 25.09.2025 of the Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19682/2024.

6.

The same is allowed. The document is taken on record. REVIEW PET. 587/2025 7.

Having considered the contents of the review petition and having heard the learned counsel for the review petitioner/petitioner, we are of the view that the petitioner, in the garb of the present review petition is wanting to re-argue the writ petition which came to be partly allowed by our Judgment dated 31.05.2024. The scope of review is not equivalent to that of an appeal. 8.

We may also note that the Special Leave to Appeal against our Judgment dated 31.05.2024 also stands dismissed by the Supreme Court vide Order dated 25.09.2025 passed in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No (s). 19682/2024, titled K S Dhingra v. Union of India & Ors.. While mere dismissal of the same may not be a ground to bar the present review petition, even having considered the submissions made on merit by the learned counsel for the review petitioner/petitioner and having perused the record, we see no ground to review our Judgment. 9.

The review petition is, accordingly, dismissed. NAVIN CHAWLA, J AMIT BANSAL, J NOVEMBER 21, 2025/ns/ik The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/11/2025 at 11:58:56