Prashant Tanwar v. The State ( NCT Of Delhi)

:?

Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

$~6&7 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 734/2019 PRASHANT TANWAR Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Surender Kumar and Mr.Aditya Awasthi, Advs.

versus THE STATE (NOT OF DELHI) Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, APP with SI Amit, PS Moti Nagar, Delhi + BAIL APPLN. 988/2019 GAURAV TANWAR & ORS •••• Petitioners Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Surender Kumar and Mr.Aditya Awasthi, Advs.

versus THE STATE (NOT OF DELHI) _ Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, APP with SI Amit, PS Moti Nagar, Delhi

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR

ORDER

o/o 07.08.2019

1. I Fresh status report stands filed.

2.

Learned APP for the State, on. the query of the Court, on instructions, submitted that the petitioners have joined the

investigation. Learned APP further submitted that on the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners produced CCTV footage of the said incident in which complainant was seen on the spot but no quarrel had taken place and the CCTV footage of the incident was analyzed by the concerned Investigating Officer (10) and the spot was also visited by the 10 for verifying the facts. 3.

Learned APP, on instructions, further submitted that the statements of eye witnesses have been recorded and they stated that the complainant injured himself voluntarily on the day of the incident. Learned APP further submitted that the petitioners are not required foi custodial interrogation.

4.

In view of the aforesaid facts, the anticipatory bail applications of the accused are allowed and it is directed that in case of the an-est of the petitioners, they be released on bail subject to their furnishing personal bonds in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of SHO/IO. The petitioners shall co operate and join the investigation as and when called by the SHO/IO in writing. Petitioners shall also not prejudice the investigation, tamper with the evidence or influence the witnesses m any manner. 5.

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail applications stand disposed of.

6.

It is clarified that this order shall not tantamount to expression of any opinion on the merits of the case.

- CHANDEKi^SMKHAR, J AUGUST 07,2019/rk