Resilient Innovations Private Limited v. M/S Bharat Pay And ORS

$~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 267/2025 & I.A. 7776/2025 RESILIENT INNOVATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through:

Mr. Kartikeya Tandon, Advocate.

versus M/S BHARAT PAY AND ORS .....Defendants Through:

Mr. Jaspreet Singh Kapur and Ms.

Shweta, Advocates for D-1.

Ms. Sangita Rai, Advocate for D-3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

O R D E R

% 23.04.2026 1.

This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiff inter alia seeking a decree for permanent injunction against the Defendants restraining Defendant Nos. 1 and 7 and all others acting on their behalf from using, manufacturing, advertising, selling, offering for sale, marketing, any domain name, website, commodity, product, service, packaging, advertising material including flyers and pamphlets, labels, stationery articles, mobile applications, email addresses, on third party platforms or any other documentation, using, depicting, displaying in any manner whatsoever, the infringing marks or any other marks which are identical to or deceptively similar to, or containing BharatPe marks in any manner or form whatsoever, including misspellings of BharatPe Marks, so as to suggest any association with the Plaintiff and which is likely to cause confusion amounting to CS(COMM) 267/2025 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/04/2026 at 12:47:04

infringement under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, amongst other reliefs.

2.

During the pendency of the suit, parties were referred for mediation before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, where they have amicably resolved their inter se disputes and executed a Settlement Agreement dated 22.04.2026, incorporating the terms of settlement. Duly attested copy of the Settlement Agreement has been handed over in Court and is taken on record.

3.

Court has perused the terms of settlement and finds the same to be lawful. Accordingly, the suit is decreed in terms of the Settlement Agreement, terms of which shall bind the parties thereto. 4.

Learned counsel for the Plaintiff submits that Plaintiff does not press any reliefs against Defendants No.2 to 7, who are proforma parties. 5.

Registry is directed to draw up the decree sheet. 6.

Suit along with pending application stands disposed of. 7.

Plaintiff is held entitled to refund of entire court fees in accordance with Court Fees Act, 1870.

JYOTI SINGH, J APRIL 23, 2026/RW CS(COMM) 267/2025 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/04/2026 at 12:47:04