← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./2424/2024

Shashi Sharma v. State Of Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

2024-03-22Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Navin Chawla2 pages

$~74 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2424/2024 SHASHI SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Shiv Kumar Gautam, Mr.Rohit Gupta and Mr.Gopal Agonia, Advs.

versus STATE OF GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Ms.Priyanka Dalal, APP with SI Manoj Kumar Ms.Sneha Solanki, Adv.

R-2(through VC)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA

O R D E R

% 22.03.2024 CRL.M.A. 9262/2024 (Exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

CRL.M.C. 2424/2024 2.

This petition has been filed challenging the Order dated 18.03.2024 passed in Application No.227/2024, titled 'K. C. Mittal v. Shashi Sharma, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge NDPS, West District, Tis Hazari Courts (hereinafter referred to as 'Trial Court'), cancelling the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner vide Order dated 09.11.2023 passed in Bail Application No. 3215/2023 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge NDPS, West, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.

3.

The ground for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2024 at 11:38:33

petitioner herein is that the petitioner had failed to comply with the terms of the settlement agreement on the basis whereof the anticipatory bail had been granted to the petitioner. 4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has now fully paid the settlement amount, in fact, in advance. The said fact is not disputed by the leaned counsel for the respondent no.2, who appears on advance notice of this petition.

5.

As the petitioner has now duly complied with the terms of the settlement agreement, and also having perused the contents of the settlement agreement, in my opinion, the Impugned Order dated 18.03.2024 deserves to be set aside. Accordingly, the Order dated 18.03.2024 is set aside.

6.

The petitioner shall continue to be released on anticipatory bail in terms of the Order dated 09.11.2023 passed by the learned Trial Court.

7.

The petition is disposed of in the above terms. NAVIN CHAWLA, J MARCH 22, 2024/ns/am Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2024 at 11:38:33