Smt Indu Khurana(Since Deceased) Through Her Legal Representative v. Shri Satish Khurana & ORS.

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 540/2023 SMT INDU KHURANA(SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HER LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Sonal Anand, Mr. Aayush Sai & Ms. Surbhi Singh, Advs.

versus SHRI SATISH KHURANA & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Kaustabh Bhardwaj, Mr. S.K.

Tanwar & Ms. Surbhi Tanwar, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

O R D E R

% 16.12.2025 1.

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2.

The present petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 seeks the following prayers:- "I. Allow the present Petition and initiate proceedings under Section ll & 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 r/w Article of the Constitution of India against the Contemnors/Respondent No. land 2 for wilfully disobeying and breaching the Status Quo Order passed by this Hon'ble Court on 08.07.2011 II Any other Order in favour of the Plaintiff as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper."

3.

The present petition alleges willful disobedience of order passed in CS (OS) 1632/2011, whereby the parties were directed to maintain status quo with respect to the suit property. It is the case of the petitioner that subsequent The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/12/2025 at 13:00:47

thereto, the respondent started construction on the said property. 4.

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the present petitioner was not the original plaintiff and has stepped into the shoes of the plaintiff by way of a Will.

5.

It is further pointed out that suit was for partition of the property and that the petitioner has not availed of his remedy under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the CPC with respect to the aforesaid order. 6.

It is an admitted case that the proceedings are still pending before learned ADJ.

7.

In these circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press this petition with liberty to approach the learned Trial Court with respect to his remedies sought herein.

8.

Leave and liberty granted.

9.

The petition is disposed of as not pressed.

10.

Needless to state that all the rights and contentions of the parties are left open.

AMIT SHARMA, J DECEMBER 16, 2025/nk/sg The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/12/2025 at 13:00:47