High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/288/2016

Babu Lal v. State

2016-01-29Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul1 pages

$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 288/2016 BABU LAL ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr Biswajit Kumar Patra, Proxy Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr Ashish Aggarwal, Addl. Standing Counsel (Crl.).

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

O R D E R

% 29.01.2016 Mr Ashish Aggarwal, learned Addl. Standing Counsel (Crl.) appearing on behalf of the official respondent, on advance notice, fairly states that the representation filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking parole, which is pending determination before the competent authority, shall be determined by the latter within a period of five working days from today in accordance with law, under intimation to the petitioner.

Ordered accordingly.

With the above direction the writ petition is disposed of, whilst reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach this court in the event he is aggrieved by the decision taken by the competent authority on his representation for parole. SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J JANUARY 29, 2016 mk