Pushpender v. State

$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 346/2016 PUSHPENDER ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Saurabh Kansal and Ms. Pallavi S. Kansal, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Ms.Kamna Vohra, ASC (Crl.) SI Sunil Kumar, P.S. Narela

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

O R D E R

% 03.02.2016 Mr. Rahul Mehra, learned Standing Counsel (Criminal) appearing on behalf of the official respondent, on advance notice, fairly states that the application for parole dated 10th November, 2015 filed on behalf of the petitioner herein, which is pending consideration before the competent authority, shall be disposed of in accordance with law within a period of seven working days from today, under intimation to the petitioner. Ordered accordingly.

The present writ petition is disposed of accordingly whilst reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court afresh in the event he is aggrieved by the order passed by the competent authority on his application for parole.

Dasti.

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J FEBRUARY 03, 2016/sd