Suraj Prasad Sharma v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation And ANR.
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3058/2019, CM No. 14091/2019 SURAJ PRASAD SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through:
Ms. Tejaswi Shetty and Ms. Anushree Malaviya, Advs.
versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR.
..... Respondents Through:
Ms. Biji Rajesh, Adv. for Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Adv. for SDMC Ms. Nishima Arora, Adv. for Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Adv. for R2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R
% 27.03.2019 CM No. 14091/2019 (for exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 3058/2019 1.
The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:
"In light of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: A. Issuance of the writ of mandamus directing the Commissioner of the South Delhi Municipal Corporation to grant the petitioner a hearing in relation to the Scheme for ownership of the Parda Begh Resettlement Colony;
B. Issuance of the appropriate, writ, remedy, or direction recognising the petitioner's right to ownership with respect to Quarter No.12, Parda Bagh Resettlement Colony, Daryaganj, New Delhi-110002;
C. Issuance of any other appropriate writ or remedy in the facts and circumstances of the present case." 2.
It is the submission of the learned counsel for the respondent No.1, who appears on advance notice that in terms of the prayer sought in the writ petition, the Corporation shall consider the writ petition as a representation and also give a hearing to the petitioner for considering the claim of the petitioner as raised in this writ petition. If that be so, it is directed that the petitioner shall appear before the Deputy Commissioner, South Delhi Municipal Corporation on April 02, 2019 at 03:00 P.M., who shall give a hearing on that date and pass an order within two weeks thereafter. 3.
If the petitioner is still aggrieved by any order to be passed by the respondent No.1, liberty is with the petitioner to challenge the same in accordance with law.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Dasti.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J MARCH 27, 2019/aky