Mohd. Yamin v. State & ANR

Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

^ THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * W.P.(CRL) 143/2016 & Crl.M.A. 837/2016 + MOHD. YAMIN Petitioner Represented by: None, versus STATE &ANR Represented by: Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC.

+ W.P.(CRL) 145/2016 & Crl.M.A. 845/2016 Represented by: None.

„ aja Petitioner SALMA versus STATES ANR , ^ v Represented by: Ms. Kamna Vohra, AoC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

ORDER

% 14.02.2017 Even on pass over, none appears for the petitioner. Steps have no been taken for service of respondent No.2. Even on the last date of hearing i.e. on 28"^ September, 2016 learned proxy counsel prayed for an adjournment as arguing counsel was not available. Fresh notice could not be issued as process fee was returned under objection. Prior thereto also steps were not taken for service of respondent No.2. Petitions and applications are dismissed for non-prosecution. MUKTA GUPTA, J.

FEBRUARY 14,2017 'v mittal'