Raveen Vats v. State Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.
$~9 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ RAVEEN VATS ..... Applicant Through:
Adv. Prasouk Jain, Adv.
versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
..... Respondents Through:
Mr. Pradeep Gahalot, APP for the State along with Adv. Anmol Jain.
SI Mukesh Chauhan, PS EOW Mandir Marg.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
O R D E R
% 16.04.2024 1.
The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail in FIR No.
99/2017, dated 07.06.2016 under Sections 409/420/120B/174A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered at Police Station Economic Offences Wing.
2.
The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the coaccused persons were granted bail by this Court by judgement dated 12.03.2024.
3.
It is not in dispute that role of the present applicant is similar to the role alleged against the co-accused Ravish Vats, who has been enlarged on bail by the judgement dated 12.03.2024, passed by this Court.
4.
This Court while granting bail to the co-accused persons noted that case is based on documentary evidence which is admittedly in the possession of the prosecution. The chargesheet and the supplementary chargesheet have already been filed and The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
the investigation in the present case is complete. The applicant is married and has one minor daughter to be taken care of. 5.
In view of the above, and considering the facts and circumstances of the present case and the fact that co-accused have already been enlarged on bail, I am satisfied that the applicant has made out a case for grant of regular bail on the ground of parity.
6.
The applicant is, therefore, directed to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond for a sum of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court/ Duty Metropolitan Magistrate/ Link Metropolitan Magistrate, on the following conditions: a. He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case or tamper with the evidence of the case, in any manner whatsoever; b. He shall under no circumstance leave the Country without the permission of the learned Trial Court; c. He shall appear before the learned Trial Court as and when directed;
d. He shall, upon his release, provide the address where he would be residing after his release and shall not change the address without informing the Investigating Officer/ SHO concerned; and e. He shall, upon his release, provide his mobile number to the Investigating Officer/ SHO concerned, and shall keep it switched on at all times. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
7.
In the event of there being any FIR/ DD entry/ complaint lodged against the applicant, it would be open to the State to seek redressal by filing an application seeking cancellation of bail. 8.
It is clarified that any observations made in the present order are for the purpose of deciding the present bail application and should not influence the outcome of the Trial and not be taken as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. 9.
The bail application is allowed in the aforementioned terms.
AMIT MAHAJAN, J APRIL 16, 2024 "SK"
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.