Ms Dewan Chand v. Union Of India

$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 255/2024 MS DEWAN CHAND ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Sameer Kaushik, Advocate.

versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 06.05.2024 I.A. 6993/2024 (Exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

The application is disposed of.

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 255/2024 3.

The present Petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitrator by 12 months from the date viz., 28.02.2024 when it expired.

4.

It is submitted that the pleadings are complete and only the arguments are to be addressed on behalf of the parties. 5.

Present none on behalf of the respondent. However, an affidavit has been annexed by Mr. Aditya Kumar Dokania, Authorised Representative of the respondent giving no objection to the extension of mandate of the Arbitrator.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/05/2024 at 11:50:36

6.

In view of the submissions made, the present petition is allowed, and the mandate of the Arbitrator is hereby extended by 12 months from the date viz., 28.02.2024 when it expired.

7.

Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J MAY 6, 2024 S.Sharma The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/05/2024 at 11:50:36