Sujata Aggarwal v. Ravi Shankar And ANR. Fc+

$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2111/2008 SUJATA AGGARWAL ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sanjay Kothiyal, Adv versus RAVI SHANKAR AND ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta & Mr R. V. Prabhat, Advs

CORAM:

SH. RAJ KUMAR TRIPATHI (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)

O R D E R

% 02.05.2018 No PW present.

Affidavit of evidence of plaintiff's other witnesses also not filed.

Cost imposed upon plaintiff vide order dated 29.11.2016 & 28.08.2017 also not deposited/paid by plaintiff till date. Plaintiff is intentionally and deliberately not coming forward to lead her evidence and proceed with the matter. They have already been granted sufficient time and opportunity for her evidence. As plaintiff is not making compliance of the repeated directions of the Court, therefore, plaintiff's evidence is hereby closed.

Counsel for plaintiff has drawn attention of this Court to Practice Direction No. 45/Rules/DHC dated 23.12.2016 of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi and thereafter, he requests to transfer the present matter to The Family Court of the concerned District. Counsel for defendants seeks time to go through the Practice Direction and the Judgment referred therein and thereafter, make his submissions on the aspect of transfer of the case. List the matter for consideration on the aspect of transfer of the case and also for defendants' evidence on 03.08.2018. SH. RAJ KUMAR TRIPATHI (DHJS) JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) MAY 02, 2018 sk