Mushabbir @ Mushvir v. Govt Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2878/2026 MUSHABBIR @ MUSHVIR .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate with petitioner in person.

versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondent Through:

Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Mr.

Upasana Bakshi, Divya Bakshi and Mr. Gourav Singh, Advocates SI Pankaj, PS-Jyoti Nagar.

Mr. Dalip Anand, Mr. Chetanyua Puri, Ms. Vidhi Gupta and Mr.

Rishabh Jain, Advocates for R-2 with R-2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

O R D E R

% 17.04.2026 1.

By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR No.735/2021 dated 31.12.2021 registered at PS.: Jyoti Nagar under Sections 354A/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Settlement dated 14.10.2025 (Annexure B) entered between the petitioner and respondent no.2 and others before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, whereby the petitioner, the respondent no.2 and others have mutually and amicably resolved their disputes. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

2.

Issue notice. Learned APP for the State accepts notice and submits that he has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. 3.

Respondent no.2, present in Court, also accepts notice and affirms the terms of the aforesaid settlement dated 14.10.2025. She submits that in compliance thereof, out of total settlement amount of Rs.5,00,000/- towards full and final settlement of all her present, past and future claims including alimony, maintenance, etc., her husband has already paid her an amount of Rs.2,50,000/- and the remaining amount of Rs.2,50,000/- shall be paid at the time of quashing of FIR No.436/2022, and as such, she has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. 4.

The petitioner and the respondent nos.2, present in Court, as well as their credentials as on record, have been identified by the Investigating Officer.

5.

Facts disclose that a settlement has already been arrived voluntarily between the petitioner, the respondent no.2 and others and the present petition is accompanied by their respective affidavit(s) qua the said effect. In view thereof, they shall remain bound by all the terms and conditions of the settlement arrived inter se themselves. As such, following the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs. Babita Raguvanshi & Anr.: (2013) 4 SCC 58, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2014) 6 SCC 466, since there is nothing left to corroborate and prove the case of the prosecution, continuation of the aforesaid FIR against the petitioners will be an exercise in futility. 6.

Thus, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.735/2021 dated 31.12.2021 registered at PS.: Jyoti Nagar under Sections 354A/506/34 of The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. 7.

Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

SAURABH BANERJEE, J APRIL 17, 2026/NA The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.