Sh. Om Prakash v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation & ANR.

$~32 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 4727/2021 & CM APPL. 14591/2021 SH. OM PRAKASH .....Petitioner Through:

Mr.

Ratnesh Bansal, Advocate (M:9810713582) versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Anupam Jindal, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 Mr.

Abhishek Bhardwaj, Mr.

Deepanshu Mathpal, Advocates for R-4 (M:9968955329)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

O R D E R

% 07.04.2025 1.

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that he has instructions to withdraw the writ petition.

2.

This Court notes that vide order dated 21st March, 2025, the statement of learned counsel for respondent-Municipal Corporation of Delhi ("MCD"), has been noted that the building in question, i.e., Property No. 2868, Gali Dharamshala Wali, Subzi Mandi, Delhi-110007, has already been declared as a dangerous building.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the tenant, and he has already handed over the possession of the shop, to the landlord.

4.

Accordingly, it is directed that the respondent-MCD shall carry out The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2025 at 15:59:57

the requisite action, in accordance with law, with regard thereto. 5.

With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition is disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J APRIL 7, 2025 au The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2025 at 15:59:57