Jatin v. State

$~5 via Video-conferencing * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (CRL.) 721/2020 JATIN ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Sumeet Singh Shokeen, Advocate.

versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) .... Respondent Through:

Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Advocate for Mr.

Rahul Mehra, SSC (Criminal) for State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

O R D E R

% 22.07.2020 Crl. M.A. No.9677/2020 (exemption) Exemption is granted, subject to just exceptions and subject to the petitioner completing all requirements of filing certified and typed copies of annexures and attested affidavits within 10 days of physical reopening of the court. Application stands disposed of.

Crl. M.A. No.9676/2020 (for compliance of order dated 16.03.2020) The petitioner seeks compliance of order dated 16.03.2020 whereby the competent authority was directed to take a decision on the petitioner's parole application within 10 days, under intimation to the petitioner.

W.P.(Crl.) 721/2020 Page of

2.

Mr. Sumeet Singh Shokeen, learned counsel for the petitioner submits however, that the petitioner has no intimation as to the status of his parole application.

3.

Issue notice.

4.

Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, learned counsel appears on behalf of Mr. Rahul Mehra, learned Senior Standing Counsel (Criminal) for the State on advance copy; accepts notice; and seeks time to file status report. 5.

Mr. Gosain states that as per his instructions, the reason parole cannot be granted is because the petitioner was awarded a prison punishment as recently as on 20.07.2020.

6.

Let status report be filed before the next date, with advance copy to the opposing counsel.

7.

Let petitioner's updated nominal roll be also requisitioned from the Jail Superintendent for the next date.

8.

List on 4th August 2020.

ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J JULY 22, 2020 Ne W.P.(Crl.) 721/2020 Page of