Kulmohan Singh v. Lalita Gangwal

$~101 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 143/2020 & CM APPL. 43582/2021 KULMOHAN SINGH .....Petitioner Through:

None.

versus LALITA GANGWAL .....Respondent Through:

Mr. H.P. Aditya, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

O R D E R

% 11.12.2024 1.

Learned Counsel for the Respondent/landlord, on the last date of hearing, had pointed out that the possession of the subject premises stood restored to the Respondent/landlord and that nothing further survives in the present matter. Learned Counsel for the Respondent/landlord seeks to rely upon the order dated 05.12.2024 passed by this Court. 2.

On 05.12.2024, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner sought time to take instructions.

3.

None appears for the Petitioner today, despite the matter being called out twice.

4.

Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed in default. Pending application also stand closed.

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J DECEMBER 11, 2024/ ha Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:33:41