Pritam Saini v. State

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 743/2020 PRITAM SAINI .....Petitioner Through :

Mr. Atul Bansal, Adv.

versus STATE .....Respondent Through :

Mr. G. M. Farooqui, APP for State.

Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Adv. with Mr.

Chetan Anand, Adv.

for the complainant.

O R D E R

% 15.05.2020 [Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19] CRL.M.(BAIL) 6436/2020 [Exemption from filing the attested copies of affidavits] 1.

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

CRL.M.(BAIL) 6288/2020 2.

Mr. Atul Bansal, who appears for the petitioner, says that the Full Bench of this Court is to convene today at 4.00 P.M. to consider as to whether the interim bail(s) granted in such like matter(s) should be extended.

3.

Given this circumstance, Mr. Bansal says that the captioned application be stood over.

BAIL APPLN. 743/2020 1/2 KUMAR RAI

4.

I must record the submission of Mr. Mohit Mathur, learned senior counsel, who appears for the complainant, that the Full Bench is considering only those matters where interim orders were passed prior to 16.03.2020 and, therefore, this case, according to him, does not fall within the scope of the proceedings that are to pending before the Full Bench. 5.

Given the fact that Mr. Bansal makes a request to stand over the matter, I see no difficulty in passing such an order. 6.

Accordingly, at request of Mr. Bansal, list the captioned application on 22.05.2020 RAJIV SHAKDHER, J MAY 15, 2020/pmc/kk Click here to check corrigendum, if any BAIL APPLN. 743/2020 2/2 KUMAR RAI