Tasleem v. State

$~16 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 260/2018 TASLEEM ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Habibur Rahman, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC.

SI Jaivind Kumar, PS Kalyanpuri.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 27.02.2018 1.

The instant writ petition under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for seeking parole for a period of three months. Status report is on record.

2.

Nominal Roll dated 08.01.2018 reveals that the petitioner was convicted under Section 376(2)(G) IPC and was sentenced to undergo RI for life with fine `10,000/-. Crl.A. 227/2000 was dismissed by this Court on 24.07.2015. Nominal Roll further reveals that the petitioner has already undergone eight years and thirteen days incarceration besides remission for one year, nine months and twenty-one days as on 07.01.2018. It further reveals that he is not involved in any other criminal case and is not a previous convict. His overall jail conduct is satisfactory. Earlier he was granted furlough on various occasions and there are no allegations of its misuse.

3.

In the interest of justice and for the reasons mentioned in the writ petition, the petitioner is granted three weeks parole from the date of his release, on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/CMM/Duty Magistrate. After completion of parole period, the petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent. 4.

Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. S.P.GARG, J FEBRUARY 27, 2018 / tr