Jai Bhagwan Nandal & ANR. v. Union Of India & ANR.

$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3882/2025 & CM APPL. 18060/2025 JAI BHAGWAN NANDAL & ANR.

.....Petitioners Through:

Mr. I. S. Dahiya and Mr. Ujjwal Sharma, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

....Respondents Through:

Ms. Anushkaa Arora, SPC with Mr.

Taranpreet Singh, Advocate for R-1/UOI.

Mr. Nikhil Palli and Ms. Bhavya Sharma, Advocates for R-2/MCD.

Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee, GP with Mr. Akash Dubey, Advocate for UOI.

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

O R D E R

% 27.03.2025 1.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2.

On being pointed out that Municipal Corporation of Delhi has been notified under Section 14(2) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 and as such the instant writ petition would not be maintainable in view of the law laid down by Apex Court in the case of. L. Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India and Ors. reported in 1997 (3) SCC 261, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty to institute the appropriate proceedings before the Central Administrative The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/04/2025 at 14:40:45

Tribunal.

3.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.

DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J MARCH 27, 2025 yrj The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/04/2025 at 14:40:45