Rishi Verma v. The State NCT Of Delhi And ANR.
$~78 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2511/2024 RISHI VERMA ..... Petitioner Through:
Mr.Vipin Chandra and Mr.Sanjeev Sarkar, Advs. along with petitioner in person.
versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through:
Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP with SI Vineesha Respondent no.2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
O R D E R
% 28.03.2024 CRL.M.A. 9559/2024 (Exemption) 1.
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 2511/2024 2.
This petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, 'Cr.P.C.') seeking quashing of FIR No.0445/2016 registered at Police Station: Sarojini Nagar, SouthDistrict, Delhi under Sections 354A/354D/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short, 'IPC'), along with all other proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of a settlement.
3.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute arose due to some misunderstanding between the parties, which lead to the registration of the abovementioned FIR. 4.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
have amicably settled their inter se disputes and have entered into a settlement vide Settlement Deed dated 11.04.2022. 5.
The respondent no.2 is personally present in Court and has been duly identified by the Investigating Officer (IO). She submits that she knew the petitioner from before and the disputes between them arose out of some misunderstanding. She reaffirms the settlement and states that she has settled all the disputes with the petitioner out of her own free will and without any coercion. The respondent no.2 submits that she has no objection if the present FIR is quashed. 6.
I have perused the contents of the FIR and also the settlement between the parties.
7.
Keeping in view the fact that the respondent no.2 does not wish to pursue her complaint any further, as also the Settlement arrived at between the parties, I find that no useful purpose shall be served in continuing with the proceedings of the present FIR as it would create further acrimony between the parties and will be an unnecessary burden on the State exchequer.
8.
Guided by the principles enunciated by the Supreme Court in its judgments in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303; Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinbhai Karmur & Ors. v. State of Gujarat & Ors. (2017) 9 SCC 641; and, State of Haryana & Ors. v. Bhajan Lal & Ors. 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335, this Court deems it appropriate, in the interest of justice, to exercise its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash the FIR and all the proceedings emanating therefrom.
9.
Accordingly, the petition is allowed. FIR No.0445/2016 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
registered at Police Station: Sarojini Nagar, South-District, Delhi under Sections 354A/354D/506 of the IPC and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom against the petitioner are quashed, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall deposit costs of Rs.30,000/- with "The Blind Relief Association, Delhi" (Bank: State Bank of India, IOC Branch, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003; Account No.30003044419; IFSC: SBIN0006564) within a period of two weeks from today, and file proof of such deposit with the Registry of this Court and also supply a copy thereof to the IO, within the said period. NAVIN CHAWLA, J MARCH 28, 2024/ns/ss Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.