Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Ashok Mittal

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 2.

+ ITA 106/2016 & CM No.3036/2016 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Mr Rahul Chaudhary, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr Raghvendra Singh, Junior Standing Counsel and Mr Sharad Aggarwal, Advocate.

versus ASHOK MITTAL ..... Respondent

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 05.02.2016

1. Learned counsel for the Revenue points out that the tax effect is less than Rs.20 lakhs. He states that in view of Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10th December 2015 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, he does not press this appeal.

2. The appeal and the application are dismissed as not pressed. S.MURALIDHAR, J VIBHU BAKHRU, J FEBRUARY 05, 2016/MK