← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./2959/2026

Shri Manjot Singh Chatwal @ Manjot Singh And ORS v. The State Of Govt Of NCT Of Delhi And ANR

2026-05-15Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee3 pages

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2959/2026, CRL.M.A. 12022-12023/2026 SHRI MANJOT SINGH CHATWAL @ MANJOT SINGH AND ORS.

.....Petitioners Through:

Ms. Shagufta Yasmin, Ms. Teresa Kaushal, Advs.

versus THE STATE OF GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Ms.

Vanshika Singh and Ms. Apoorva Khosla, Advs.

Mr. Vineet Aggarwal, Mr. Kunal, Mr.

Jatin and Ms.

Bhavya Aggarwal, Advs. for R-2 SI- Jatin, PS: Tilak Nagar

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

O R D E R

% 15.05.2026 1.

By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.795/2023 dated 28.11.2023 registered at PS: Tilak Nagar under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of Compromise-cumSettlement dated 06.01.2026 [Annexure P2] arrived between the petitioner no.1 and the respondent no.2, which is accompanied by their The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

respective proofs of identities.

2.

Issue notice.

3.

Learned APP for the State accepts notice and submits that she has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. 4.

Respondent no.2, present in Court, also accepts notice and affirms the terms of the aforesaid Compromise-cum-Settlement dated 06.01.2026, whereby the petitioner no.1 has already paid her a sum of Rs.23,50,000/- out of the total settlement amount of Rs.37,00,000/- and a Demand Draft dated 02.04.2026 bearing No.918714 of Rs.13,50,000/- (Punjab & Sind Bank) has been handed over in Court to her today as the full and final settlement of all her present, past and future claims including alimony, maintenance, etc. Respondent no.2 further submits that her marriage with the petitioner no.1 has since been dissolved and as such, she has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. 5.

The petitioners and the respondent no.2, present in Court, as well as their credentials, as on record, have been identified by the IO. 6.

Facts disclose that a settlement has already been arrived voluntarily between the petitioners and the respondent no.2 and the present petition is accompanied by their respective affidavit(s) to that effect. In view thereof, the parties shall remain bound by all the terms and conditions of the settlement arrived inter se themselves. As such, following the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs. Babita Raguvanshi & Anr.: (2013) 4 SCC 58, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2014) 6 SCC 466, since there is nothing left to corroborate and prove the case of the prosecution, continuation of the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

aforesaid FIR against the petitioners will be an exercise in futility. 7.

Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.795/2023 dated 28.11.2023 registered at PS: Tilak Nagar under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.

8.

The present petition, alongwith the pending application, is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

SAURABH BANERJEE, J.

MAY 15, 2026/Ab The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.