Renu v. The State Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi And ORS.
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1000/2025 RENU .....Petitioner Through:
Mr.Madhu Sudan Bhayana, Mr.Madhav, Mr.Yash Gupta, Advs. with petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.
.....Respondents Through:
Mr.Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Ms.Priyam Agarwal, Mr.Abhinav Kr. Arya, Mr.Aryan Sachdeva, Advs for the State.
Insp.Parmod Kumar, PSBegumpur.
Mr.Madhukar Pandey, Adv. for R-4,6,7 (VC).
R-4 in person (VC).
Child xxx through VC with Mr.Om Prakash Sharma, Principal of the school.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R
% 03.02.2026 1.
The present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking issuance of a Writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce Master X before this Court and directing the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and 8 to ensure the safety and security of Master X and also a direction to the Mahila Court to hear the matters of visitation and custody of the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 13:27:01
children on priority for the sake of their lives and extensive welfare. 2.
The petition itself disclosed that there are matrimonial disputes between the petitioner and the respondent no.4, for which the petitioner has even availed of her legal rights. The complaint of the petitioner is that in the proceedings that she had taken, the respondent no.4 is not bringing the child to the Court in spite of directions from the Court.
3.
Notice of this petition was issued to the respondents vide order dated 28.03.2025.
4.
Today, the child appears before us virtually. Along with him Mr.Om Prakash Sharma, Principal of the school where he is studying, is also present.
5.
We are of the opinion that as the petitioner has already availed of her legal remedy for the custody and visitation right over the child, no further direction can be passed in the present petition. The concerned Court is competent to decide all the disputes and also to pass appropriate directions in such proceeding in accordance with the law.
6.
Accordingly, we dispose of the present writ petition, leaving the parties to their own respective remedies in accordance with law. NAVIN CHAWLA, J RAVINDER DUDEJA, J FEBRUARY 3, 2026/Arya/as The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 13:27:01