Anant Raj Ltd v. Yes Bank Ltd

$~A-33 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 3040/2020 ANANT RAJ LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Saket Sikri and Mr.Nikhil Singhvi, Advs.

versus YES BANK LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ashwini Chawla, Advocate on behalf of YES Bank Ltd.

Mr.Parag P.Tripathi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Ramesh Babu, Adv. for R-2/RBI

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH

O R D E R

% 18.08.2020 This hearing is conducted through Video Conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that benefit of the moratorium period as per the RBI Circular has been granted to the petitioner and writ petition to that extent is infructuous. Learned counsel appearing for Yes Bank in the written submissions has also confirmed that the Writ Petition is infructuous. Nothing further survives in this matter. Petition is accordingly disposed of. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. JAYANT NATH, J AUGUST 18, 2020/n By:NIRMLA TIWARI 15:09:05