The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Inter Globe Technology Quoteint Pvt. Ltd.

<D $-1,2,9 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ ITA 345/2017 THE PR.COMMISSIONEROF INCOMETAX-4 .....Appellant Through:

Mr. RuchirBhatia& Mr. PuneetRai, Advocates versus INTERGLOBETECHNOLOGYQUOTIENTPVT. LTD.

Respondent Through:

Mr. AdityaVohra,Advocates WITH + ITA 346/2017 THE PR. COMMISSIONEROF INCOMETAX-4 Appellant Through:

Mr. RuchirBhatia&Mr. PuneetRai, Advocates versus INTERGLOBETECHNOLOGYQUOTIENTPVT. LTD.

Respondent Through:

Mr. AdityaVohra,Advocates WITH .

+ ITA 355/2017 THE PR.COMMISSIONEROF INCOMETAX-4 Appellant Through:

Mr. RuchirBhatia& Mr. PuneetRai, Advocates versus INTERGLOBETECHNOLOGYQUOTIENTPVT. LTD.

Respondent Through:

Mr. AdityaVohra,Advocates ITA NO.34S/2017&connectedmatters pgg^j qJ2 By:AMULYA

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR

ORDER

% 30.05.2017 CM No. 16881/2017 in ITA No. 345/2017 & CM No. 16897/2017 in ITA No. 355/2017 1.Allowed,subjectto alljust exceptions.

CM No. 16882/2017 in ITA No. 345/2017.

CM No. 16883/2017 in ITA No. 346/2017 & CM No. 16898/2017 in ITA No. 355/2017

2. For the reasons statedtherein,the applicationsare allowed.Delay of 38 days in re-filingthe appealsis condoned.

ITA Nos. 344/2017. 345/2017 & 355/2017

3. These are three appeals by the Revenue against a common order dated 26'^' July, 2017 passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunalin ITA Nos. 419/Del/2011for the AssessmentYear ('AY') 2007-08, 5830/Del/2011for AY 2008-09, ITA No. 1463/Del/2013 for AY 2009-10 and 6144/Del/2013 for AY 2010-11.

4. The question raised by the Revenue in these appeals stands answered against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee by a decision of this Court dated 22"'' May, 2017 in ITA No. 330/2017 titled Principal Commissionerof Income Tax v. Inter Globe TechnologyQuotientPvt. Ltd.

5. The appealsare, accordingly,dismissed.

S.MURALIDHAR, J iNl5ERi CHANDER SHEKHAR, J MAY 30, 2017/tp ITA No.345/2017& connectedmatters