Bharat Aluminium Company Limited & ORS. v. Union Of India

$~Writ-1 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 3112/2020 BHARAT ALUMINIUM COMPANY LIMITED & ORS.

.....Petitioners Through Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. With Ms.

Ranjana Roy Gawai, Ms. Vasudha Sen, Ms. Prachi Golechha and Ms.Ananya Chug, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

O R D E R

% 15.06.2020 [Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19] 1.

Ms. Shiva Lakshmi has returned with instructions. 2.

Ms. Shiva Lakshmi says that the allocation of the subject material has taken place qua the petitioners, amongst others, after making adjustment visa-vis the quantities already released to them. 2.1 Ms. Shiva Lakshmi also informs me that the minutes of the meeting, whereby allocation in favour of the petitioners and those who are similarly circumstanced was approved, is available on the DGFT's website. 2.2 Furthermore, I am informed by Ms. Shiva Lakshmi that the regional authorities have been asked to issue physical licenses to all the applicants, which include the petitioners as well, at the earliest. 3.

It appears that compliance has been made of orders passed by this Court on previous dates.

W.P.(C) 3112/2020 1/2 KUMAR RAI 01:41

3.1 Accordingly, the petition will be consigned to the record. 4.

The DGFT will ensure that the regional authorities comply with its directions, at the earliest, though, not later than three days from today. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J JUNE 15, 2020 pmc/KK Click here to check corrigendum, if any W.P.(C) 3112/2020 2/2 KUMAR RAI 01:41