← Library
High Court of DelhiBAIL APPLN./898/2020

Pramod v. State NCT Of Delhi

2020-05-14Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Asha Menon2 pages

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 898/2020 PRAMOD ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Kanhaiya Singhal, Advocate.

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

O R D E R

% 26.06.2020 CRL.M.A.8273/2020 (exemption from filing legible/typed copies and duly attested affidavits) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. The duly attested copy of affidavits shall be filed within one week of the resumption of the regular functioning of the Court. CRL.M.A.8272/2020 (seeking extension of interim bail for 45 days) 1.

The hearing was conducted through video conferencing. 2.

Petitioner, by this application seeks extension of interim bail granted to the petitioner by order dated 14.05.2020. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an asthmatic patient and suffering from several illnesses and has also been categorised as 'High Risk Person" because of Covid-19. He submits that by order dated 14.05.2020, petitioner was granted interim bail for a period of 45 days in terms of the guidelines issued by the High Powered Committee constituted under the directions of the Supreme Court. BAIL APPLN. 898/2020

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per order dated 14.05.2020, petitioner has been directed to surrender to the concerned Superintendent, Jail on 27.06.2020. He submits that in subsequent meeting of the High Powered Committee, held on 20.06.2020, keeping in view the prevailing situation, it has been recommended that the interim bail granted to the under trial prisoners, on the basis of the criterion laid down by the High Powered Committee, be further extended for a period of 45 days from the date their earlier period of interim bail is expiring.

5.

Learned APP for the State, under instructions, submits that petitioner has already been declared at high risk because of Covid-19, as he is suffering from several ailments.

6.

There is no dispute that petitioner is covered by the recommendations of the High Power Committee dated 20.06.2020. Accordingly, the interim bail granted to the petitioner by order dated 14.05.2020, is extended for a further period of 45 days from 27.06.2020 on the same terms and conditions and surety.

7.

Accordingly, petitioner is directed to surrender before the concerned Superintendent, Jail on or before 12.08.2020. 8.

Application is, accordingly, allowed in the above terms. 9.

Copy of the order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J JUNE 26, 2020/st BAIL APPLN. 898/2020