Kartik Subramaniam v. State

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL.) 810/2020 KARTIK SUBRAMANIAM ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms.Warisha Farasat and Ms.Shruti Narayan, Advocates.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Ms.Richa Kapoor, ASC for State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING)

O R D E R

% 14.05.2020 CRL. M.A. Nos.6353/2020, 6354/2020, 6355/2020 & 6356/2020 (Exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

Applications stand disposed of.

W.P.(CRL.) 810/2020 1.

The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking extension of parole granted to him vide order dated 18.02.2020 in W.P.(Crl.) 399/2020.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that initially the petitioner was released on parole for a period of six weeks. She further submits that by virtue of the order dated 27.03.2020, the parole granted to the petitioner was extended by the Govt. of NCT of Delhi, whereby the parole of all the

convicts was extended on account of Covid-19 pandemic prevalent in the country.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to the Minutes of Meeting of the 'High Powered Committee' dated 05.05.2020 and the order dated 09.05.2020 passed by the said Committee in W.P.(C) 3080/2020. 4.

In view of the Resolution of the 'High Powered Committee' as well as the order dated 09.05.2020, the parole granted to the petitioner vide order dated 18.02.2020 is extended by another period of eight weeks on the same terms and conditions.

5.

The petition stands disposed of in the above terms. 6.

A copy of this order be communicated to the concerned Jail Superintendent for information and necessary compliance. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J May 14, 2020 'dc'