Raks Trade Logistics Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner/Gsto, Ward 94

$~77 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5374/2026 & CM APPL. 26301/2026, CM APPL. 26302/2026, CM APPL. 26303/2026 RAKS TRADE LOGISTICS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Chinmaya Seth, Mr. A.K. Seth, Ms. Palak Mathur, Mr. Karanveer Singh, Advocates versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER/GSTO, WARD 94 .....Respondent Through:

Ms. Urvi Mohan with Ms. Priyanka Jindal, Advs. for GNCTD

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL

O R D E R

% 22.04.2026 1.

On instructions, a prayer for withdrawal is made as the petitioner intends to take recourse to the statutory remedies as are available and advisable in law.

2.

The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. 3.

We, hereby, clarify that we have not appreciated the merits of the matter.

NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J AJAY DIGPAUL, J APRIL 22, 2026/DM/OK The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/04/2026 at 13:01:17