Sukash @ Sukesh Chandrashekar v. Central Tihar Jail

$~10 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 819/2020 CRL.M.A. 6503/2020 SUKASH @ SUKESH CHANDRASHEKAR ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Advocate with Mr Mahesh Agarwal, Mr Vishal Gosain, Mr Mayank Tripathi, Mr Himanshu Satija and Ms Megha Bahl, Advocates.

versus CENTRAL TIHAR JAIL ..... Respondent Through:

Mr Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel for State with Mr Chaitanya Gosain, Advocate for State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 03.07.2020 [Hearing held through video conferencing] 1.

At the outset, Mr Rohatgi, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the petitioner is not a hardened criminal and is not a security risk. He states that he has no objection, if the petitioner is put under any surveillance but he cannot be placed in solitary confinement. 2.

After some arguments, Mr Rohatgi seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to revive the same, if the petitioner's grievance subsists. 3.

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. All the pending applications are disposed of.

VIBHU BAKHRU, J JULY 03, 2020/MK