Vineet K. Wadhwa v. Union Of India & ANR.

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3211/2020 VINEET K. WADHWA ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

..... Respondents Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, ASG with Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC, Mr. Srivats Kaushal and Mr. R.V. Pravat Advocates for UOI.

Mr. Anupam Srivastava, ASC with Ms. Divya Joshi, Advocate for GNCTD.

Ms. Anisha Upadhyaya, Advocate for DTTDC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

O R D E R

% 11.08.2020 The present matter has been heard by way of video conferencing. On the last date of hearing the petitioner was given an opportunity to amend the petition and file an amended memo of parties. The petitioner states that he has filed an amendment application vide diary No. 605855/2020, however no amendment application is on record. Since the present writ petition is at the initial stage and the procedure for amendment is time consuming, the petitioner who appears in person, wishes to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition on the

same cause of action.

Consequently, present writ petition as well as pending applications are disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action.

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the party in person/learned counsel through email. MANMOHAN, J SANJEEV NARULA, J AUGUST 11, 2020 sb