Trisha Mahajan v. Union Of India & ANR

$~4.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3253/2020 TRISHA MAHAJAN ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms.Namita Roy, Adv. with Mr.Abhijit Acharya, Adv.

Versus

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Ms.Maninder Acharya, ASG with Ms.Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC and Mr.Viplav Acharya, Adv. for R-1.

Mr.Santosh Kr.Tripathi, ASC for GNCTD.

Mr.Shikhar Kishore, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

O R D E R

% 27.05.2020 1.

Proceedings of the matter has been conducted through video conferencing.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it would suffice for the disposal of this writ petition, if the same is treated as representation by respondent No.1 and decided in accordance with law. 3.

Looking to the limited submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is directed to be treated as representation by respondent No.1 and the same be considered in accordance with law, rules, regulations and Government policies applicable to the facts of the case. 4.

The specific suggestion made in the petition, with regard to W.P.(C) 3253/2020 Page 1 of 2

installation of CCTV cameras in kitchen/food processing area is concerned, that could assist the Food Inspectors in monitoring and ensuring the infection free preparation of food in consonance with the set guidelines, shall be kept in mind by the concerned authorities while considering the said representation.

5.

With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN, J MAY 27, 2020 'anb'

W.P.(C) 3253/2020 Page 2 of 2