Chander Shekhar Kumar @ Mukhiya v. State (NCT Of Delhi)

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 310/2020 CHANDER SHEKHAR KUMAR @ MUKHIYA .....Appellant Through:

Mr. Roshal Lal Saini, Advocate (through VC) versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through:

Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for State with SI Dhiraj Singh, P.S. Shalimar Bagh, Delhi Mr. Himanshu Anand Gupta, Mr Shekar Anand Gupta, Ms. Mansi Yadav, Mr. Siddharth Barna, Ms.

Navneet Kaur, Ms. Shivani Rampal and Mr. Bharat Ranjan, Advocates for DSLSA.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 16.12.2025 1.

Mr. Roshal Lal Saini, learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions from the appellant, who is present in Court and duly identified by the I.O states that the appellant has already undergone the entire sentence and having understood the consequences, he does not wish to press the appeal on merits.

2.

He submits that the fine has already been paid. 3.

Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as not pressed. 4.

Learned counsel appearing for DSLSA submits that the compensation could not be disbursed as the victim remained untraceable. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/12/2025 at 12:05:29

5.

Learned APP for the State, submits that the I.O had been able to contact the father of the victim who would facilitate the victim/her father in approaching Member Secretary DSLSA who would ensure that compensation awarded to the victim is disbursed at the earliest. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J DECEMBER 16, 2025 sn The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/12/2025 at 12:05:29