Raj Kumar Hans v. The New India Assurance Company Limited, & ANR.

$~80 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 216/2025 & CM APPL. 18749-18751/2025 RAJ KUMAR HANS .....Appellant Through:

Mr. Ran Veet Singh & Mr. Ravinder Singh, Advocates.

versus THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

O R D E R

% 02.04.2025 1.

The Registry is directed to ensure that prior to listing the Applications seeking condonation of delay, the Registry correctly calculates the actual delay.

2.

Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that there have been inadvertent errors in the Appeal that has been filed. 3.

Learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the present Appeal with liberty to file an amended appeal. 4.

The liberty is granted albeit in accordance with law. 5.

The present Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. The pending Applications also stand closed. TARA VITASTA GANJU, J APRIL 2, 2025/ ha Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/04/2025 at 12:58:09