Jaipal Singh v. State

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 848/2020 JAIPAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Siddharth Yadav, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA

O R D E R

% 01.06.2020 1.

The hearing has been conducted through Video Conferencing. Crl.M.A.No.6946/2020 2.

Exemption allowed, subject to the condition that petitioner will file the duly sworn/attested affidavit and the requisite Court fee within 72 hours from the date of resumption of the regular functioning of this Court.

3.

The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(CRL) 848/2020 4.

This writ petitioner is filed by the petitioner seeking parole for 60 days on account of the marriage of his son fixed on 29.06.2020. 5.

Admittedly, the petitioner has not moved any application for parole before the jail authorities; hence this writ petition may be treated as an application for parole and be placed before the DG (Prisons), (Parole Committee) within two days from today. The matter be considered and disposed of within a week thereafter by the concerned authority. The decision the DG (Prisons) be also communicated to the petitioner.

6.

The petition stands disposed of in above terms. 7.

Copy of this order be sent electronically to the Jail Superintendent for compliance.

YOGESH KHANNA, J.

JUNE 01, 2020 DU/M