Airtec Electrovision Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India And ORS.

SINDHU KRISHNAKUMAR 19.06.2020 21:04 $~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3300/2020 & CM APPL.11571/2020 AIRTEC ELECTROVISION PVT. LTD.

..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Advocate. (M:

9810806329)

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC for UOI.

Mr. Ajit Warrier, Mr. Tejas Karia, Mr. Gauhar Mirza and Mr. Shijo George, Advocates for R-2 & 3. (M:

9810323014)

CORAM:

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

O R D E R

% 19.06.2020 1.

This hearing has been held through video conferencing. 2.

Mr. Bajaj, ld. counsel appearing for the Petitioner, submits that the Petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition and does not press for any relief against Respondent Nos.2 & 3. However, he seeks liberty to pursue a criminal complaint to ascertain the identity of the unknown person(s) who may have hacked the Instagram account of the Petitioner. 3.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The Petitioner is given liberty to avail its legal remedy to trace the identity of any unknown person(s) who are alleged to have hacked its account. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

JUNE 19, 2020/dk/T By:PRATHIBA M SINGH