Neelam Rani Nagpal & ANR v. Jyto Bareja & ORS

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 335/2011 NEELAM RANI NAGPAL & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. Anuj Rajpal, Advocate versus JYTO BAREJA & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr. Rajesh Anand and Mr. Aviral Mittal, Advocates for D-1to3, 6 to 8.

CORAM:

SH. RAJESH KUMAR SINGH (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR

O R D E R

% 02.08.2017 IA No. 3747/2017 (under Order XIII Rule 9 CPC filed by defendants No. 6 to 8) and IA No. 3748/2017 (under Order XIII Rule 9 CPC filed by defendants No. 1to3) Submission of learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for plaintiff heard in the pre lunch session and matter taken up for order in the post lunch session. In the IA the applicants have not given the details of the documents and the date on which the documents were filed. Perusal of record reveals only filing of three original deeds by proposed defendants No. 6 to 8 vide index dated 28.05.2014. No documents of defendants No. 1to 3 could be found on record. The applicants are directed to submit the details of the documents and the date of filing. Compliance be made within two weeks.

Adjourned to 4th September, 2017 consideration of the IAs / for further proceedings.

RAJESH KUMAR SINGH (DHJS) JOINT REGISTRAR AUGUST 02, 2017/ms