Jai Prakash And ORS. v. Union Of India And ORS.

$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3502/2019 JAI PRAKASH AND ORS.

..... Petitioners Through:

Mr.Bhanu Gupta, Advocate.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Ms.Saron Bidawat, Advocate.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

O R D E R

% 05.04.2019 CM APPL.16075/2019 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 3502/2019

2. Counsel for the Petitioners seeks an interim direction to stay their respective superannuations from the BSF, on 28th February, 2019 consequent upon the judgment of this Court dated 31st January, 2019 in WP(C) No. 1951/2012 (Dev Sharma v. ITBP).

3. The attention of the counsel for the Petitionera has been drawn to the order passed by this Court on 4th February, 2019 in WP (C) No. 695/2019 (Ram Chander Kasania v. Union of India). In the said order this Court explained that in Dev Sharma v. ITBP (supra) this Court had granted the Respondents four months‟ time to take all consequential steps by way of

implementation of the said judgment and what should happen in the interregnum for those who completed the age of superannuation as it presently stands. That order would govern the case of the present Petitioners as well.

4. The petition is disposed of in the above terms. S.MURALIDHAR, J PRATEEK JALAN, J APRIL 05, 2019 / tr