Jagannath v. State

via Video-conferencing $~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPL. No.1130/2020 JAGANNATH ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Anil Goel, Adv.

versus STATE/N.C.T. OF DELHI .... Respondent Through:

Mr. G.M. Farooqui, APP for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

O R D E R

% 15.06.2020 The matter is listed today based on Office Note dated 15.06.2020, which points-out that inadvertently order dated 11.06.2020 in Bail Appl. No.1030/2020 has come to be uploaded in the present matter which is Bail Appl. No. 1130/2020. For the record, the signed copy of the order in hard copy that has been placed on the court file of this matter is the correct order.

2.

It turns-out that on 11.06.2020, Bail Appl. No.1030/2020 was listed at Item No.5 and Bail Appl. No.1130/2020 (the present matter) was listed at Item No.6 before this court. It would appear that by reason of the similarity in Bail Application numbers, by inadvertent error, the order Bail Appl. No.1130/2020 Page of Signed By:SUNITA RAWAT Location:

11:53:03

in Bail Appl. No.1030/2020 came to be uploaded in the present matter i.e. Bail Appl. No.1130/2020. However, the correct order was uploaded in Bail Appl. No.1030/2020.

3.

Accordingly, to rectify the above, it is directed that the correct order dated 11.06.2020 be uploaded in Bail Appl. No.1130/2020 in the electronic file ; and the order of Bail Appl. No.1030/2020 be removed from the electronic file.

4.

Office Note is disposed of in the above terms. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J JUNE 15, 2020 Ne Bail Appl. No.1130/2020 Page of Signed By:SUNITA RAWAT Location:

11:53:03