← Library
High Court of DelhiBAIL APPLN./1136/2020

Priya @ Priya Mishra v. State

2020-07-03Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Shakdher3 pages

$~B.A. - 1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1136/2020 PRIYA @ PRIYA MISHRA .....Petitioner Through Mr. Vinay Kumar Sharma, Adv.

versus STATE .....Respondent Through Mr. G.M. Farooqi, APP.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

O R D E R

% 03.07.2020 [Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19] 1.

Pursuant to the last order i.e. order dated 17.06.2020, a supplementary status report has been filed in the matter.

2.

A perusal of the supplementary status report, inter alia, does indicate that the co-accused in the case i.e. the ex-husband of the petitioner has been looking after the children, which includes the daughter, one, Ms. Harminie Arora, pursuant to his enlargement on bail.

2.1 The order enlarging the petitioner's ex-husband i.e. Mr. Harish Arora, on bail, was passed on 18.05.2020 by the Metropolitan Magistrate, North West District, Rohini, Delhi.

2.2 Via this order, Mr. Harish Arora was enlarged on interim bail for 45 days.

1/3

2.3 The reason given for enlarging the co-accused i.e. Mr. Harish Arora on bail, in the aforementioned order i.e. order dated 18.05.2020, was that since the investigation is complete in the matter and the charge-sheet has already been filed, there was hardly any chance that the accused would tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses. 3.

Clearly, the period of 45 days would expire shortly, if not already expired.

3.1 In fact, I am informed by Mr. Sharma, counsel for the petitioner, that the ex-husband of the petitioner was required to surrender on 02.07.2020. 4.

Given the overall circumstances, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on interim bail, for a period of 30 days, subject to the following conditions.

i.

The petitioner will furnish a personal bond of Rs. 15,000/- with a surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned duty Magistrate. The surety will be a permanent resident of Delhi. ii.

The period of interim bail will commence from the date of release of the petitioner.

iii.

The petitioner will surrender to the concerned Jail Superintendent on expiry of the aforementioned period of enlargement. iv.

The petitioner will establish, every day, telephonic contact with the Investigating Officer.

v.

Needless to add, the petitioner will neither get in touch, directly or indirectly, with any person/witness who is concerned with the trial of the case, nor will she tamper with the evidence. 2/3

vi.

Before releasing the petitioner, the concerned Jail Superintendent will work out the modalities with the concerned authorities in the State of Uttarakhand to effectuate directions issued by this Court while keeping in mind the social distancing norms and other protocols put in place in connection with the Coronavirus pandemic. vii.

The petitioner will provide her mobile number to the concerned Jail Superintendent before being enlarged on bail. The concerned Jail Superintendent will furnish the same to the Investigating Officer. 7.

The Registry will communicate the order passed today, electronically, to the concerned Jail Superintendent.

8.

The captioned bail application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J JULY 03, 2020 pmc/KK Click here to check corrigendum, if any 3/3