← Library
High Court of DelhiBAIL APPLN./1281/2025

Neh Srivastava v. State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi Through Station House Officer Ps Economic Offences Wing Mandir Marg New

2025-04-08Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Amit Mahajan2 pages

$~73 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 1281/2025 NEH SRIVASTAVA .....Applicant Through:

Mr. Piyush Pathak and Mr.

Rohit Yadav, Advs.

versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH STATION HOUSE OFFICER PS ECONOMIC OFFENCES WING MANDIR MARG NEW DELHI .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP for the State with SI Mohit Prakash, EOW.

Mr.

Madhav Khurana, Senior Advocate with Mr.

Shaurya Singh, Adv. for the complainant.

Mr. Aditya Sharma, Mr.

Manoj Rajpoot, Mr.

Dushyant Sharma, Ms.

Mehak Khanna and Ms.

Kritika Bhardwaj, Advs.

for Cross Officer Enclave Victim Association.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

O R D E R

% 08.04.2025 CRL.M.A. 9971/2025 (exemption from filing certified copies of the annexures and dim annexures) 1.

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2.

The application stands disposed of.

BAIL APPLN. 1281/2025 & CRL.M.A. 9972/2025 3.

By the present bail application, the applicant seeks regular bail in FIR No. 92/2020 dated 07.08.2020, registered at Police Station Economic Offences Wing, for offences under Sections The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2025 at 15:39:12

409/420/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

4.

The bail application filed by the applicant on an earlier occasion being BAIL APPLN. 3320/2023 was dismissed by this Court by order dated 05.08.2024. The SLP filed by the applicant challenging the order dated 05.08.2024, passed by this Court, was dismissed noting that the charges have not been framed and forensic investigation regarding the genuineness of the signature is underway.

5.

The Hon'ble Apex Court, thus, considering the stage of the case, dismissed the SLP.

6.

The learned counsel for the applicant submits that certain grounds were not taken at the time when the application was filed on the earlier occasion.

7.

He submits that in such circumstances, the present bail application is maintainable since the bail has been sought on the grounds which were not agitated earlier.

8.

He, however, seeks liberty to withdraw the present bail application and file an application seeking clarification before the Hon'ble Apex Court.

9.

In view of the above, the present bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s) also stand disposed of.

AMIT MAHAJAN, J APRIL 8, 2025 'KDK'

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2025 at 15:39:12