Nirmal Bhatnagar & ANR. v. Shri Vividh Makhija

$~72 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 92/2024 NIRMAL BHATNAGAR & ANR.

.....Petitioners Through:

versus SHRI VIVIDH MAKHIJA .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Satish Bajaj, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN

O R D E R

% 27.08.2024 1.

Mr. Satish Bajaj, Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent stated that the possession of the tenanted premises is restored back to the respondent in execution proceedings in accordance with law and as such, the present revision petition has become infructuous. 2.

None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the case was called for hearing at 03:20 P.M.

3.

It appears that the petitioner is not interested in the prosecution of the present petition.

4.

The present petition is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J AUGUST 27, 2024 j/tk/am The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/08/2024 at 11:37:28