M/S. Super Wash v. Govt Of NCT Of Delhi And ORS.
$~72 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4160/2025 & CM APPL. 19324/2025 M/S. SUPER WASH .....Petitioner Through:
Mr Amit Chadha, Sr. Adv. alongwith Mr Sanjog Singh, Mr Atin Chadha, Mrs Munisha Chadha, Mr Harjas Singh, Mr Dhruv Tomar Advocates.
versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.
.....Respondents Through:
Mr. Dhananjaya Mishra, Adv. & Mr.
Navneet Dogra, Adv. for R-1 & 3.
Mr. Dhananjaya Mishra, Adv. & Mr.
Navneet Dogra, Advs. for R-2.
Mr. Kush Sharma, Ms. Nishchaya Nigam, Ms. Niharika and Ms. Disha, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R
% 20.01.2026 1.
The petitioner seeks to challenge the order dated 29.08.2019 and the subsequent order dated 15.10.2019.
2.
The solitary grievance raised by the petitioner is that the Impugned Order dated 29.08.2019, whereby, direction to deposit an Environmental Compensation to the tune of Rs. 85.40 Lakhs, was passed without hearing the petitioner. According to Mr. Chadha, learned senior counsel, under similar facts and circumstances, matters have been remitted back to the concerned authority for fresh disposal. He has placed reliance on various The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2026 at 13:18:09
orders passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 2616/2022, W.P.(C) 936/2020, W.P.(C) 14015/2019, W.P.(C) 781/2020, W.P.(C) 774/2020 and W.P.(C) 12285/2019.
3.
The Court is of the opinion that the impugned orders dated 29.08.2019 and 15.10.2019 were passed in violation of the principles of natural justice. Consistent with the line of precedents emerging from the orders rendered in the aforenoted cases, the instant petition stands disposed of, with the following terms:
a. The impugned order sands set-aside.
b. Let the respondent no.2 to issue a show cause notice ('SCN') within 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the order passed today.
c. Once the petitioner receives the said the notice, let the reply be filed within 30 days thereafter; and d. The concerned authority, thereafter, shall be at liberty to pass an appropriate speaking order.
4.
If the petitioner thereafter has any grievance, it shall be at liberty to take appropriate recourse in accordance with law. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JANUARY 20, 2026/P/KSR The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2026 at 13:18:09