← Library
High Court of DelhiBAIL APPLN./1604/2026

Sanjay Chauhan & ANR. v. State Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

2026-04-27Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Girish Kathpalia3 pages

$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 27.04.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 1604/2026 & CRL.M.A. 12874/2026 SANJAY CHAUHAN & ANR.

.....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Himanshu Saxena, Advocate (through video conferencing) versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with IO/WSI Seema.

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1.

The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 592/2023 of Police Station Najafgarh for offence under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act.

2.

Broadly speaking, the allegation against the accused/applicant is that he used to visit the kiosk of father of the prosecutrix to purchase cigarettes and that is how he developed friendship with her. Once the prosecutrix was returning home by foot, the accused/applicant suddenly stopped his motorcycle and asked her if he could drop her home. The prosecutrix agreed Page 1 of 3 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45 569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d155 70996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26 fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.04.27 05:07:21 -07'00'

because of acquaintance with him. At that stage, the accused/applicant kissed her and took a picture. On being asked to delete that picture, the accused/applicant stated that he would show the picture to her parents. After that the accused/applicant repeatedly called her at night for sexual favours. This is extracted from testimony of the prosecutrix before the trial court. 3.

Learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that he is in custody since 30.12.2023 and the trial has almost concluded, so the accused/applicant deserves to be released on bail. It is further submitted that since the trial is proceeding at a slow pace, the accused/applicant be granted bail. Learned counsel for accused/applicant also submits that the prosecutrix and her parents have no objection if the bail is granted to the accused/applicant.

4.

On the other hand, learned APP for State assisted by IO/WSI Seema strongly opposes the bail application on the ground that the prosecutrix was aged hardly 15 years at the time of the alleged incident, so even her consent, if at all there was any, is not relevant.

5.

In view of the fact that trial has almost concluded, it would not be appropriate for this court to make any observation regarding the nature of relationship between the accused/applicant and the prosecutrix. At present, what is to be kept in mind is that age of the prosecutrix at the time of the alleged incident was hardly 15 years. The issue as to whether the prosecutrix was coerced into sexual relations or it was her voluntary decision, even if Page 2 of 3 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45 569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa , cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.04.27 05:07:10 -07'00'

the age of consent is ignored, would be within the domain of the trial court by way of analysis of prosecution evidence. Trial, as mentioned above has almost concluded.

6.

In view of the aforesaid, I do not find it a fit case to release the accused/applicant on bail. The present bail application and the accompanying application are dismissed.

7.

But the learned trial court is directed to ensure that the entire sessions case, in which the present bail application has been filed, is disposed of within a period of three months from today, provided the accused/applicant does not take any adjournment. Copy of this order be sent to the learned trial court forthwith.

8.

Copy of this order be also sent to concerned Jail Superintendent for being informed to the accused/applicant.

2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4af ec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacc a, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d 15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff 801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.04.27 05:06:58 -07'00'

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) APRIL 27, 2026/ry Page 3 of 3 pages