Aman Kumar Rastogi v. The State Of NCT Of Delhi

via Video-conferencing $~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (CRL) 894/2020 AMAN KUMAR RASTOGI ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Advocate.

Versus

THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .... Respondent Through:

Mr. Avi Singh, ASC for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

O R D E R

% 06.07.2020 Synopsis of arguments and compilation of case law have been filed on behalf of the petitioner as also by the State. 2.

Mr. Saurabh Kansal, learned counsel for the petitioner has made submissions based thereupon.

3.

Mr. Avninder Singh, learned ASC for the State has also made submissions in the matter.

4.

Mr. Singh submits that the State considers an application for 'emergency parole' as one seeking 'furlough'; whereas an application for 'parole' simpliciter is treated differently. 5.

In the circumstances, Mr. Kansal seeks leave to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file for parole, with a request that the same be considered within a stipulated time-frame. 6.

Accordingly the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to file an application seeking parole before the Jail W.P.(Crl.) 894/2020 Page of

Administration, which will be decided in accordance with law within 02 weeks of filing.

7.

The petition stands disposed of.

8.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 9.

A copy of this order be sent to the Jail Superintendent. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.

JULY 06, 2020 Ne W.P.(Crl.) 894/2020 Page of