Ved Yadav v. State (NCT Of Delhi)

$~70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1092/2024 VED YADAV ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Sidharth Yadav, Advocate.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 04.04.2024 CRL.M.A. 10320/2024 (exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(CRL) 1092/2024 3.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition as an application for grant of furlough has not yet been moved in appropriate form, before the competent authority. He further states that he will move an appropriate application before the competent authority.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is at liberty to do so. 5.

It is directed that the competent authority will expeditiously, decide the same.

6.

With the above terms, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn and accordingly disposed of.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2024 at 12:12:03

7.

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J APRIL 4, 2024/at Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2024 at 12:12:03